Thursday, August 27th, 2009 | Author:

All emotional posting will be deleted. You must EXPLAIN how a 65 million year old (EXTINCT FISH) has been found ALIVE on numerous occasions.

This Fish is 65 Million Years Old???

 

http://creation.com/correcting-the-headline-coelacanth-yes-ancient-no

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses

  1. 1
    admin 

    http://www.creationontheweb.org

    This is a great place to obtain information concerning the truth and scientific evidence for creation. If you believe that just believing it is enough, you are wrong. I believe that evolution is one of the main, if not the chief source of reasoning, not to believe in the Bible, and therefore Jesus Christ. It is an enemy of salvation.

  2. Some posts are so one sided, it was a pleasure to see one written that allowed a person to see both sides.

  3. 3
    CentaursDoExist 

    This article is just rubbish, and the whole idea of this forum is pointless. Science doesn’t go against evolution it supports it. Evolution was born from science, this creationism nonsense was born from ignorance. If anyone seeks the “truth” please pick up your nearest science textbook.

  4. 4
    Truth63 

    I like how my previous comment never made it, I guess your “truth” can’t stand on it’s own. Evolution is fact, it’s backed by science because it was born from science, logic, and reason. If you want to believe in the bible and Jesus Christ fine do it. You shouldn’t have to try to validate your religion with science, that defeats the purpose of faith. It shows how shallow, and vain your beliefs really are. Now delete that.

  5. 5
    admin 

    Never saw any of your previous posts unless you are talking about the one directly above it.

    What about the article is rubbish. Are you saying it’s a lie?

    Your nearest science textbook still contains lies that evolutionists put in their which have been proven to be lies.

    Christianity is not validated by science. How can it? Historical reliability does not use a scientific method to validate it. Science is rather a way man has found to show an Intelligent Designer much greater than some unexplained, unknown evolutionary origin.

    You hurl all of these accusations, but offer nothing in rebuttal except character assassination and unfounded statements. How can a theory be fact?

  6. 6
    admin 

    Whoa Whoa Whoa! Truth63- Are you an Iota?

Leave a Reply